All about dental implant One tooth missing Several teeth missing All teeth missing Advanced implant solution Immediate Implant
Astra Tech BioManagement Complex

 Immediate/early loading protocol

Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant     placement, and loading
A retrospective analysis of peri-implant tissue responses at immediate load/provisionalized microthreaded     implants
Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration     without the use of bone grafting: A review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical     trial
A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery
A retrospective analysis of early and delayed loading of full-arch mandibular prostheses using three     different implant systems: clinical results with up to 5 years of loading
Outcomes of a fluoride modified implant one year after loading in the posterior-maxilla when placed with     the osteotome surgical technique

When high primary stability is achieved, immediate and early loading protocols have been reported safe and successful in the scientific literature. In this section, you will find summaries on documentation of immediate and early loading using the Astra Tech Implant System'".

A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery

Purpose: This 3-year prospective study set out to document the survival of Astra Tech Fixture ST placed in the anterior maxilla, and subject to a rapid loading protocol.

Material and Methods: Patients were recruited when requiring replacement of one or two teeth in the anterior maxilla. All patients presented with bone volume that would allow an implant longer than 11 mm to be placed. Patients were excluded on the grounds of unstable dental disease, parafunction, occlusal instability, smoking or low bone density. A diagnostic work-up with mounted study models and tomographs was completed for each case.

At time of implant surgery a single-tooth implant (Astra Tech, ST) was placed according to manufacturer's protocol to achieve good primary fixation. A healing abutment was then secured using finger pressure so as to effect a transmucosal healing. After a 3-week period, the healing abutment was removed and a final abutment secured, again with finger pressure, to ensure that the restorative margin was 1 mm below the mucosal margin. A direct temporary crown was fabricated at the chairside using Protemp and was cemented with Temp Bond.

A baseline long-cone radiograph was taken, along with an assessment of implant mobility, papilla index, presence or absence of inflammation, presence or absence of plaque, and width of keratinized tissue.

Eight weeks after surgery the temporary crown was removed and a final impression taken for the subsequent fabrication and cementation (glass ionomer) of the definitive ceramic, or ceramometal crown. At this time the abutment screw was tightened to 20 Ncm. Data was collected at 6 months and 1, 2 and 3 years post insertion of the temporary crown. In addition radiographic follow-up allowed the assessment of peri-implant radiolucencies, as well as the marginal bone changes with respect to an established reference point on the implant.

Results: 57 implants were placed in 51 patients, however 4 patients were subsequently found to be smoking and were excluded. For the remaining 53 implants, the majority of surgical sites presented with type 2 or 3 bone quality and class A or B bone volume. 70% of implants were longer than 13 mm and 83% were inserted in the central or lateral incisor positions. Of these implants one was diagnosed as a failure at time of temporary crown fabrication and another at 8 weeks, when the master impression was due, yielding a survival rate of 96.2%. At the 1-year recall there was minimal evidence of peri-implant mucosal inflammation (3.6%), with a net gain in papilla length of 0.61 mm.

Radiographic follow-up revealed a 0.59 mm change in marginal bone levels, which appeared to stabilize after 9 weeks, with 70% recording a bone loss of less than 1 mm. No complications were recorded with respect to abutment screw loosening. Some prosthetic complications were recorded with respect to crown decementation and crown fracture. One case of peri-implant mucositis recovered uneventfully, when treated with antibiotics.

Discussion and Conclusion: A survival rate of 96.2% is comparable with other single-tooth studies utilizing a standard protocol for unloaded healing. In addition tissue response was favorable, with a healthy maintenance of marginal bone and filling out of interdental papillae, aiding a good esthetic result. Implant design and the conical implant-abutment connection have been cited as important factors in the maintenance of these tissues, and also contribute to a stable connection, highlighted by an absence of abutment screw loosening.

In conclusion this study demonstrates that in the presence of good primary stability, single-tooth implants can be subject to a rapid loading protocol, yielding an efficacious and predictable result.

Press Releases
SMILE-HIGH CLUB, Dental Tourism Takes Off
NOTHING
but the
TOOTH
Bangkok smile
on dental tourism

From Unlimited Inspiring Business, issue 110, November 08 
Case : Zygomatic Implants (immediate loading / Nobel biocare)
Name : Mr. T. Clark , Palmer, Alaska, U.S.A

Case: All on 6 at Upper and Lower jaw (immediate loading / Nobel biocare)
Name: Ms.Karina Taylor : Australia

Case: All on 4 at Lower jaw (immediate loading / Nobel biocare)
Name: Mrs.Shena Clowes , Australia

Case: All on 4 ( Upper and Lower )
Name: Mr. Timothy Adkins, USA

Case: All on 4 ( Upper and Lower ) Name: Mr. Ross Throne, Australia

Copy right by @ thaiimplantcenter.com